Epicor Data Migration
Migrate without losing the numbers you report on.

Businesses that migrate from Epicor usually go to NetSuite, Business Central, MYOB Acumatica or Xero. An Epicor to Odoo migration is worth a look when you want finance, stock and production in one system you can extend. Some choose a modular architecture where finance, inventory, and operational workflows are split across multiple applications. The right answer depends on whether the business still wants one large ERP footprint or would be better served by a more modular stack.

Yes, when the business is ready for it. An Epicor to Xero migration suits a business whose finance needs are now simpler than Epicor was built for. We convert Epicor to Xero by moving the chart of accounts, customers, suppliers, open invoices and bills, and opening balances, then the historical data you want to keep, either as transactions or as monthly balances. Stock, production and job costing usually move to a specialist app joined to Xero. Payroll moves to Xero Payroll or a separate payroll system and is checked before the first pay run. The Epicor to Xero conversion is signed off when the trial balance agrees in both systems.

Not the destination work. Epicor Kinetic to Xero and an older on-premise install, which many people call Epicor desktop, both come out by reading the Epicor database directly, whether that is Kinetic, Vantage or Vista. When you transfer Epicor desktop to Xero, the essentials come across first: accounts, contacts, open items and balances. History and reports follow in the order you choose. Most businesses switch at the start of a financial year or a quarter.

Yes. Every Epicor conversion is scoped across finance, inventory, customer and supplier records, reporting layers, and the operational data that the target design requires. The exact coverage depends on which Epicor modules and surrounding processes you currently rely on.

No. We audit what those processes do and decide which are still valuable, which can be retired, and which should be rebuilt differently around the destination platform. Migration projects go better when old complexity is reduced instead of copied forward unchanged.

Often yes. Reporting is one of the best areas to improve early because it reduces dependence on the old ERP while also making the migration easier to manage later. We can build dashboards and reporting layers that reconnect to the destination platform after cutover.

It depends on the operational footprint, reporting dependencies, integration count, and destination platform. For many environments, the project is measured in months rather than weeks. We scope from the real environment before committing to timing.

Yes, in many cases. Some teams separate reporting first, then finance, then operations. Others move into another ERP in one coordinated program. We shape the project around risk, operational timing, and budget rather than forcing every Epicor migration into one model.